In vitro susceptibilities and molecular analysis of vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

46Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. There is increasing frequency of vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VISA and VRSA) isolates identified in clinical practice. There are limited reports evaluating susceptibility patterns and molecular characteristics of these strains. Methods. Laboratory analysis was performed on 13 VRSA and 33 VISA isolates, including susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes, arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME), and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing using polymerase chain reaction. Strain typing using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on VRSA isolates. Results. Telavancin, linezolid, tigecycline, and minocycline were active against >90% of VISA isolates, while >90% of VRSA isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, linezolid, minocyline, tigecycline, rifampin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. There were no VISA or VRSA isolates that carried PVL genes or ACME, and most strains (69.8%) were staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type II. VRSA isolates were predominantly related to USA100 (53.8%) and none were related to USA300 or USA400. Conclusions. A large number of available antimicrobial agents retain very good in vitro activity against VRSA and VISA isolates. The present isolates appear to be derived from healthcare-associated strains based on the absence of features associated with community-associated strains, and VRSA isolates are polyclonal by PFGE. © The Author 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saravolatz, L. D., Pawlak, J., & Johnson, L. B. (2012, August 15). In vitro susceptibilities and molecular analysis of vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis492

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free