On-pump beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Comparative study on early and long-term clinical outcomes

10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: We reviewed our experience with on-pump beating (OPB) heart coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to evaluate the impacts of obviating aortic cross-clamping and cardioplegic arrest on clinical outcomes compared with conventional CABG (C-CABG). Methods: Between 2006 and 2012, elective isolated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-assisted CABG was consecutively performed in 645 patients (mean patient age 63.3±9.1 years, 471 women) with 254 (39.4%) undergoing OPB-CABG and 391 (60.6%) undergoing C-CABG. The early and long-term clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups after adjusting for risk profiles through propensity score (PS) analyses. Results: The OPB-CABG group presented significant morbidities more frequently than the C-CABG group, including severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (P=0.026), severe chest pain (P < 0.001), and poor left ventricular function (P < 0.001). Early mortality occurred in 6 (2.4%) and 2 (0.5%) patients in the OPB- and C-CABG group, respectively (P=0.087). The number of distal anastomosis was comparable between the two groups (3.0±0.9 vs. 3.0±1.0, P=0.816). After PS matching, the incidence of major complications such as stroke (P > 0.99) and new-onset dialysis (P=0.109) was comparable. During a median follow-up of 81.0 months (quartiles 1-3, 66.6-95.0 months), 118 patients died and the PS-matched models showed no significant between-group differences in the risk of overall death [hazard ratio (HR), 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.95; P=0.507] and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.67-3.31; P=0.328). Conclusions: The OPB strategy may be as safe and effective as the conventional strategy during CABG among patients with similar risk profiles. A prospective randomized trial is warranted to better ascertain the beneficial impact of OPB-CABG as both a viable and a durable alternative strategy to C-CABG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. J., Oh, Y. N., Ju, M. H., Kim, J. B., Jung, S. H., Chung, C. H., … Choo, S. J. (2018). On-pump beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Comparative study on early and long-term clinical outcomes. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(5), 2656–2665. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free