Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations

39Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how different bracket-slot design characteristics affect the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium (NiTi) alignment wires at different amounts of wire deflection. Materials and Methods: A three-bracket bending and a classic-three point bending testing apparatus were used to investigate the load-deflection properties of one superelastic 0.014-inch NiTi alignment wire in different experimental conditions. The selected NiTi archwire was tested in association with three bracket systems: (1) conventional twin brackets with a 0.018-inch slot, (2) a self-ligating bracket with a 0.018-inch slot, and (3) a self-ligating bracket with a 0.022-inch slot. Wire specimens were deflected at 2 mm and 4 mm. Results: Use of a 0.018-inch slot bracket system, in comparison with use of a 0.022-inch system, increases the force exerted by the superelastic NiTi wires at a 2-mm deflection. Use of a selfligating bracket system increases the force released by NiTi wires in comparison with the conventional ligated bracket system. NiTi wires deflected to a different maximum deflection (2 mm and 4 mm) release different forces at the same unloading data point (1.5 mm). Conclusion: Bracket design, type of experimental test, and amount of wire deflection significantly affected the amount of forces released by superelastic NiTi wires (P < .05). This phenomenon offers clinicians the possibility to manipulate the wire's load during alignment. (Angle Orthod. 2014;84:541-547.) © 2014 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nucera, R., Gatto, E., Borsellino, C., Aceto, P., Fabiano, F., Matarese, G., … Cordasco, G. (2014). Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations. Angle Orthodontist, 84(3), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.2319/060213-416.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free