Comparative analysis of the alternative dispute resolution practices of Indonesia and Philippines

Abstract

This study explores students’ perceptions of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) practices in the Philippines and Indonesia, analyzing common practices, levels of implementation, and challenges encountered. A quantitative descriptive research design was employed, utilizing a survey questionnaire. Findings indicate that mediation is the most commonly implemented ADR practice, while online dispute resolution (ODR) is the least utilized. The study also revealed that ADR practices are widely implemented but suffer from lack of public awareness, which limits accessibility. Common challenges includes limited knowledge on ADR options and delays in processing disputes, highlighting the need for broader awareness campaigns and procedural improvements. It concludes that while ADR is an effective mechanism for dispute resolution in both countries, efforts should be made to enhance public awareness, integrate digital tools, and streamline ADR processes. Strengthening education and training on ADR, along with policy improvements, can further optimize its implementation, ensuring greater accessibility and efficiency in dispute resolution mechanisms.