Fast and slow precipitation responses to individual climate forcers: A PDRMIP multimodel study

176Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Precipitation is expected to respond differently to various drivers of anthropogenic climate change. We present the first results from the Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), where nine global climate models have perturbed CO2, CH4, black carbon, sulfate, and solar insolation. We divide the resulting changes to global mean and regional precipitation into fast responses that scale with changes in atmospheric absorption and slow responses scaling with surface temperature change. While the overall features are broadly similar between models, we find significant regional intermodel variability, especially over land. Black carbon stands out as a component that may cause significant model diversity in predicted precipitation change. Processes linked to atmospheric absorption are less consistently modeled than those linked to top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing. We identify a number of land regions where the model ensemble consistently predicts that fast precipitation responses to climate perturbations dominate over the slow, temperature-driven responses.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Forster, P. M., Hodnebrog, Andrews, T., Faluvegi, G., … Voulgarakis, A. (2016). Fast and slow precipitation responses to individual climate forcers: A PDRMIP multimodel study. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(6), 2782–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free