Comparison of the BBL mycobacteria growth indicator tube, the BACTEC 12B, and solid media for the isolation of Mycobacterium bovis

Abstract

We compared different methods for their ability to isolate Mycobacterium bovis from tissue samples from animals with lesions resembling bovine tuberculosis. In the first trial, M. bovis was isolated from 86 of 200 tissue samples that were cultured using 2 liquid media, BACTEC 12B and BBL mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT), and a solid medium, Middlebrook 7H11 supplemented with pyruvate (7H11P). M. bovis was isolated from 2 samples with MGIT but not BACTEC 12B. M. bovis was isolated from 9 samples with BACTEC but not MGIT; these 9 samples came from the North Canterbury/Marlborough region of New Zealand. The proportion of tissues from which M. bovis was isolated with BACTEC 12B or MGIT and the mean time for isolation was different for samples from the North Canterbury/Marlborough region but not the rest of New Zealand. In the second trial, M. bovis was isolated from 401 of 1,033 tissues that were cultured using MGIT, Middlebrook 7H9 broth, or solid 7H11P. The proportion of isolates of M. bovis and the mean time for their isolation with MGIT was different for the North Canterbury/Marlborough and the rest of New Zealand. The reason for this difference was not determined but may be related to the genotypes present in this region. Genotyping using variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) of 197 isolates of M. bovis revealed that the 44 isolates from North Canterbury/Marlborough were represented by 2 closely related VNTR types that were not found in 153 isolates from the remainder of New Zealand.