SQE-ezed out: SRA, status and stasis

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article considers the proposals to introduce the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) from a widening participation angle. It argues that the SQE will not increase access to the solicitors profession but will instead perpetuate patterns of subordination and risks further silencing already unrepresented social groups. The paper examines the widening participation agenda in relation to the solicitors profession concluding that there is little incentive or real commitment to widening access. The paper then examines the SQE and the widening access rhetoric which has, for a time at least, accompanied it and questions whether the assertions and assumptions about how the SQE can improve diversity in the profession really hold true.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guth, J., & Dutton, K. (2018). SQE-ezed out: SRA, status and stasis. Law Teacher, 52(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2018.1534341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free