PRO DAN KONTRA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERS SEBAGAI LEX SPECIALIS ( Memaksimalkan Profesionalitas Pers dalam Menjalankan Aktifitas Jurnalistik )

  • Amri S
  • Maulina P
  • Zuhri A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aims of this study is to examine how the pros and cons of Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press as a lex specialis from a legal point of view. This research is a descriptive qualitative study with a literature review approach, which focuses on discussing the substance of the law and the issues under study in accordance with the relevant literature. The results of the study illustrate that there are pros and cons related to the position of the Law. No.40 of 1999 concerning the press as lex specialis. The pro side illustrates that press activities and various disputes that arise in it when referring to the press law that has been specially formulated is used to solve press problems specifically, so that it is considered a lex specialis. On the other hand, it emphasizes that the press law from various sides does not meet the requirements as a lex specialis because there is no clear legal basis for reference from any parent law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amri, S., Maulina, P., & Zuhri, A. (2021). PRO DAN KONTRA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERS SEBAGAI LEX SPECIALIS ( Memaksimalkan Profesionalitas Pers dalam Menjalankan Aktifitas Jurnalistik ). SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.35308/source.v7i1.3521

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free