Any pair of 2D curves is consistent with a 3D symmetric interpretation

19Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Symmetry has been shown to be a very effective a priori constraint in solving a 3D shape recovery problem. Symmetry is useful in 3D recovery because it is a form of redundancy. There are, however, some fundamental limits to the effectiveness of symmetry. Specifically, given two arbitrary curves in a single 2D image, one can always find a 3D mirror-symmetric interpretation of these curves under quite general assumptions. The symmetric interpretation is unique under a perspective projection and there is a one parameter family of symmetric interpretations under an orthographic projection. We formally state and prove this observation for the case of one-to-one and many-to-many point correspondences. We conclude by discussing the role of degenerate views, higher-order features in determining the point correspondences, as well as the role of the planarity constraint. When the correspondence of features is known and/or curves can be assumed to be planar, 3D symmetry becomes non-accidental in the sense that a 2D image of a 3D asymmetric shape obtained from a random viewing direction will not allow for 3D symmetric interpretations. © 2011 by the authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sawada, T., Li, Y., & Pizlo, Z. (2011). Any pair of 2D curves is consistent with a 3D symmetric interpretation. Symmetry, 3(2), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym3020365

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free