Neuropsychological evaluation and follow-up of children with cerebellar cortical dysplasia

8Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim To describe neuropsychological disturbances and the developmental course associated with cerebellar cortical dysplasia (CCD). Method The neuroimaging findings from 10 children (five males, five females; aged 3-10y) with CCD were reviewed and classified. These children all underwent clinical neurological examination and neuropsychological assessment (NPA) on admission, then were followed for an average of 6years using the cognitive Wechsler Scale, Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure/McCarthy Drawing subtests. Results Based on magnetic resonance imaging, CCD was categorized as minor (n=4), moderate (n=1), and severe (n=5). The first NPA disclosed mental retardation* in six (profound, three; moderate, one; mild, two) and normal intelligence in four (low, two; average, one; high, one), but with verbal/performance dissociation in three cases. Socio-adaptive functions were altered in all children except one. Visuospatial abilities were delayed in eight children. In the follow-up, no progression was observed in the three cases with profound mental retardation, whereas the remainder showed homogeneous or disharmonic progression, including improvement or deterioration of verbal/performance function. Cognitive impairment and evolution was not associated with the degree of cerebellar involvement. Interpretation The neuropsychological profile and evolution associated with CCD do not appear to be predictable, and some features might improve over time. © The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology © 2011 Mac Keith Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jissendi-Tchofo, P., Pandit, F., Soto-Ares, G., & Vallee, L. (2011). Neuropsychological evaluation and follow-up of children with cerebellar cortical dysplasia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53(12), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04117.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free