TAVR for All? The Surgical Perspective

3Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In spite of the noninferiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high- and intermediate-risk patients, there are still obstacles that need to be overcome before the procedure is further expanded and clinically integrated. The lack of evidence on the long-term durability of the bioprostheses used for TAVR remains of particular concern. In addition, surgery may be preferred over TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or with concomitant pathologies such as other valve diseases (mitral regurgitation/tricuspid regurgitation), aortopathy, and coronary artery disease. In this review, we discuss and summarize relevant data from clinical trials, current trends, and remaining obstacles, and provide our perspective on the indications for the expansion of TAVR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Puehler, T., Frank, D., Sathananthan, J., Sellers, S., Meier, D., … Lutter, G. (2022, July 1). TAVR for All? The Surgical Perspective. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free