'Some more reliable than others': Image management, donor perceptions and the Global War on Terror in East African diplomacy

35Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article explores the role of perceptions in donor-African relations and the extent to which donor 'images' of African governments can be managed by these same governments to their advantage. The article focuses on donor views of 'reliability' in the Global War on Terror (GWOT) and compares differing international perceptions of Kenya and Uganda through this lens. Arguing that donors have an exaggerated sense of Ugandan 'compliance' or reliability and Kenyan unreliability in fighting terrorism, it explains this by examining the two governments' international 'image management' strategies, or lack thereof. The analysis contends that Uganda's success at promoting itself as a major donor ally in the GWOT, compared with Kenya's general reluctance to do the same, has played a significant role in building and bolstering these differing donor perceptions. This, the article suggests, raises important questions about the nature of African agency in the international system. © 2013 Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fisher, J. (2013). “Some more reliable than others”: Image management, donor perceptions and the Global War on Terror in East African diplomacy. Journal of Modern African Studies, 51(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X12000535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free