False prophet, or genuine savior? Assessing the effects of economic openness on sustainable development, 1980-99

56Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While many herald globalization - the increasing interconnectedness of national economies - to be associated with rising standards of living across the globe, others fear its effects on sustainability. Antiglobalization forces and environmentalists view these developments as a threat to the welfare of future generations because of profligate and excessive current consumption. This study is the first to estimate the effects of dependence on trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), and an index of economic freedom on the World Bank's measure of sustainability (the genuine savings rate), which measures the rate at which investment in the total stock of manufactured, human, and natural capital exceeds its depreciation. Contrary to pessimists' fears, our indicators of economic openness show positive effects on sustainability, results that are robust to sample size, testing procedure, and several alternative specifications. The results support those who suggest that distorted economies tend to be both inefficient and damaging to future generations. If increasing trade, FDI, and economic freedom are hallmarks of globalization, then worries about its effects on future well-being are misplaced. © 2005 by The IO Foundation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Soysa, I., & Neumayer, E. (2005, June). False prophet, or genuine savior? Assessing the effects of economic openness on sustainable development, 1980-99. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050253

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free