Landiolol, esmolol and propranolol protect from ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated guinea pig hearts

24Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Beta blockers are thought to exert beneficial effects on the ischemic heart. The authors examined the effects of landiolol (ONO 1101), a highly selective β1 antagonist, propranolol, a non-specific β blocker, and esmolol, a selective β1 antagonist, on postischemic contractile recovery. Drugs were given prophylactically. Methods: Ischemia-reperfusion in isolated guinea pig hearts was induced by stopping the perfusion for 45 min and reperfusing for 60 min. Hearts (n = 7 in each group) were treated with or without propranolol (1 or 10 μM), esmolol (5 or 50 μM), or landiolol (20, 100 or 500 μM) ten minutes before inducing ischemia. Results: At the end of reperfusion, left ventricular pressure (LVP) recovered to 64 ± 3% of the baseline value in the control group. With 1 and 10 μM propranolol, LVP recovered to 90 ± 5% and 100 ± 6% of the baseline value at 60 min after reperfusion, respectively. Fifty μM but not 5 μM of esmolol resulted in restoration of LVP to 97 ± 17% of the pre-ischemic value at 60 min after reperfusion. In hearts pretreated with 100 and 500 μM landiolol, LVP was restored to 109 ± 5% and 104 ± 5% of the baseline value, respectively. Landiolol 100 μM did not depress LVP in the pre-ischemic period. Conclusions: The present study shows that landiolol, an ultra-short-acting cardioselective β1 blocker, has cardioprotective effects on ischemia-reperfusion injury in isolated guinea pig hearts. All three β blockers were equally protective but the intermediate dosage of landiolol preserved LVP during the pre-ischemic period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurosawa, S., Kanaya, N., Niiyama, Y., Nakayama, M., Fujita, S., & Namiki, A. (2003). Landiolol, esmolol and propranolol protect from ischemia/reperfusion injury in isolated guinea pig hearts. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 50(5), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03021062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free