Navigating the ‘field’: Reflexivity, uncertainties, and negotiation along the border of Bangladesh and India

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Drawing on a fourteen-month ethnographic fieldwork experience along the border of Bangladesh and India, I offer a narrative of daily challenges and uncertainties in the ‘field’. Highlighting my positionality and reflexivity, I suggest that first, although a researcher may use social capital to gain access, it may raise concerns regarding the genuineness of the participant’s response. Second, with careful attention, unplanned moments and spontaneous conversations can be turned into sources for valuable insight. Third, pushing the boundaries of social norms to attain a textbook example of ‘gender balance’ does not necessarily ‘add value’ to the research; instead, is likely to make it more challenging to access the same population for further research. Finally, I reaffirm that being from the same region with a similar background does not make the researcher an ‘insider’. Rather, their positionality becomes more ‘fluid’ and constantly shifts between an insider, an outsider, both, and sometimes none.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferdoush, M. A. (2020). Navigating the ‘field’: Reflexivity, uncertainties, and negotiation along the border of Bangladesh and India. Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138120937040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free