Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of cyclic loading on the marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of direct vs indirect Class II composite restorations in an in-vitro model. Forty Class II cavities were prepared on the mesial surface of extracted human maxillary first premo-lars and divided into two groups: Group I - direct composite restorations and Group II - indirect composite restorations. Groups I and II were further divided into subgroups: A (without cyclic loading) and B (with cyclic loading of 150,000 cycles at 60N). The gingival margin of the proximal box was evaluated at 200x magnification for marginal adaptation in a low vacuum scanning electron microscope. The restorations were sectioned perpendicular to the bonded surface into 1 mm thick slabs. The slabs were further trimmed at the interface to produce a cross-sectional surface area of approximately 1 mm2. All specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. The marginal adaptation was analyzed using descriptive studies and bond strength data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA test. The indirect composite restorations performed better under cyclic loading. © Operative Dentistry, 2008.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Aggarwal, V., Logani, A., Jain, V., & Shah, N. (2008). Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs indirect class II MO composite restorations. Operative Dentistry, 33(5), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-152
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.