Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography

370Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a response classification based on integration of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) into the International Workshop Criteria (IWC) provides a more accurate response assessment than IWC alone in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients and Methods: Fifty-four patients with aggressive NHL who underwent FDG-PET and computed tomography 1 to 16 weeks after four to eight cycles of chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone were assessed for complete response (CR), unconfirmed CR (CRu), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) by the IWC and by integrated IWC and FDG-PET (IWC + PET). Progression-free survival (PFS) was also compared between IWC- and IWC + PET-assigned response designations. Results: By IWC, 17 patients had a CR, seven had a CRu, 19 had a PR, nine had SD, and two had PD. In comparison, by IWC + PET, 35 patients had a CR, 12 had a PR, six had SD, one had PD, and zero had a CRu. In separate multivariate models, PFS was significantly shorter in patients with PR than in those with a CR using IWC (hazard ratio [HR], 8.9; P = .021) or IWC + PET (HR, 29.7; P = .0003). However, when the two classifications were included in the same multivariate model, only IWC + PET was a statistically significant independent predictor for PFS (P = .008 v P = .72 for IWC). In addition, when patients with a PR by IWC and a CR by IWC + PET were compared with those with a CR by IWC and a CR by IWC + PET, there was no significant difference in PFS (HR, 1.6; P = .72), indicating that IWC + PET identified a subset of IWC-PR patients with a more favorable prognosis. Conclusion: Compared with IWC, the IWC + PET-based assessment provides a more accurate response classification in patients with aggressive NHL. © 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Juweid, M. E., Wiseman, G. A., Vose, J. M., Ritchie, J. M., Menda, Y., Wooldridge, J. E., … Cheson, B. D. (2005). Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by integrated International Workshop Criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(21), 4652–4661. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.891

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free