The "impact factor" revisited

170Citations
Citations of this article
261Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The "impact factor" (IF) is the most commonly used assessment aid for deciding which journals should receive a scholarly submission or attention from research readership. It is also an often misunderstood tool. This narrative review explains how the IF is calculated, how bias is introduced into the calculation, which questions the IF can or cannot answer, and how different professional groups can benefit from IF use. © 2005 Dong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2005, July 26). The “impact factor” revisited. Biomedical Digital Libraries. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-2-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free