A comparative study between non-linear regression and artificial neural network approaches for modelling wild oat (Avena fatua) field emergence

13Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-linear regression (NLR) techniques are used widely to fit weed field emergence patterns to soil microclimatic indices using S-type functions. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) present interesting and alternative features for such modelling purposes. In the present work, a univariate hydrothermal-time based Weibull model and a bivariate (hydro-time and thermal-time) ANN were developed to study wild oat emergence under non-moisture restriction conditions using data from different locations worldwide. Results indicated a higher accuracy of the neural network in comparison with the NLR approach due to the improved descriptive capacity of thermal-time and the hydro-time as independent explanatory variables. The bivariate ANN model outperformed the conventional Weibull approach, in terms of RMSE of the test set, by 70·8%. These outcomes suggest the potential applicability of the proposed modelling approach in the design of weed management decision support systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chantre, G. R., Blanco, A. M., Forcella, F., Van Acker, R. C., Sabbatini, M. R., & Gonzalez-Andujar, J. L. (2014). A comparative study between non-linear regression and artificial neural network approaches for modelling wild oat (Avena fatua) field emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, 152(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859612001098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free