Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: A clinicallyand cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care

85Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Overactive bladder affects millions of adults, with profound personal and economic costs. Although antimuscarinic drugs can cause a reduction in voiding symptoms, the effect is modest, and many patients are intolerant of the side effects, or do not experience sufficient relief. For these patients, the modulation of bladder reflex pathways via percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or via implanted sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been acknowledged as a logical next step in the algorithm of care. This review examines the mechanism of action, the relative benefits, adverse effects, and costs of percutaneous nerve stimulation compared to other treatment modalities. © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Staskin, D. R., Peters, K. M., MacDiarmid, S., Shore, N., & De Groat, W. C. (2012, October). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: A clinicallyand cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Current Urology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-012-0274-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free