Abstract
Overactive bladder affects millions of adults, with profound personal and economic costs. Although antimuscarinic drugs can cause a reduction in voiding symptoms, the effect is modest, and many patients are intolerant of the side effects, or do not experience sufficient relief. For these patients, the modulation of bladder reflex pathways via percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or via implanted sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been acknowledged as a logical next step in the algorithm of care. This review examines the mechanism of action, the relative benefits, adverse effects, and costs of percutaneous nerve stimulation compared to other treatment modalities. © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Staskin, D. R., Peters, K. M., MacDiarmid, S., Shore, N., & De Groat, W. C. (2012, October). Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: A clinicallyand cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Current Urology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-012-0274-9
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.