THE ROLE OF PROCTORING IN PERSONAUZED INSTRUCTION 1

  • Farmer J
  • Lachter G
  • Blaustein J
  • et al.
28Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effect of amount of student‐proctor interaction was investigated within the framework of Keller's (1968) method of personalized instruction. College students enrolled in introductory psychology were randomly assigned to five groups: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, reflecting the percentage of units on which each student was proctored. The results indicated that (a) the proctored students were superior to the non‐proctored students as measured by final examination performance, (b) for the proctored groups, the amount of proctoring did not differentially affect final examination performance, and (c) the major effect of increased proctoring was an acceleration of the rate of progress through the course.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farmer, J., Lachter, G. D., Blaustein, J. J., & Cole, B. K. (1972). THE ROLE OF PROCTORING IN PERSONAUZED INSTRUCTION 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(4), 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1972.5-401

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free