Evaluation of the use of CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in migraine prophylaxis in a private clinic

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction Migraine is considered the second most prevalent neurological disorder in the population and highly disabling. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies in migraine prophylaxis, with emphasis on therapeutic response, adverse effects, and impacts on quality of life. Methods A quantitative, retrospective, and descriptive study was carried out, through the analysis of medical records and telephone interviews with patients seen at the Serviço de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, in the city of Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, currently or previously having used at least one dose of the medication. Results 44 patients participated in the study, and 79% of the sample was using erenumab, 14% frenezumab and 7% galcanezumab. After treatment, approximately 14% of respondents had a resolution of 100% of the monthly pain days and 61% reported headache up to 5 days a month, considered to be excellent in 66% of the sample. Therefore, medications reduced, on average, 15 days/month of headache attacks, corresponding to a decrease of approximately 67% of pain days. Approximately 80% of participants noted reduction in pain intensity and 77% improvement in work capacity. In addition, 93.2% of patients reported no adverse effects and 72.7% said they intended to continue therapy. Conclusion Thus, it is understood that CGRP monoclonal antibodies are able to reduce monthly headache days, reduce pain intensity and promote improvement in work capacity. Therefore, they can be considered effective, safe and well-adhered medications for migraine prophylaxis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farenzena, N., & Fröhlich, A. C. (2023). Evaluation of the use of CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in migraine prophylaxis in a private clinic. Headache Medicine, 14(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.48208/HeadacheMed.2023.17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free