Erythromycin susceptibility of viridans streptococci from the normal throat flora of patients treated with azithromycin or clarithromycin

30Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. To study the emergence of macrolide resistance in throat flora following treatment with clarithromycin or azithromycin. Methods. Throat samples were collected before and after treatment and plated as a lawn on Columbia blood agar with an erythromycin E test strip. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin were determined against isolates of distinct morphology with erythromycin E test MIC results equal to or greater than 2 mg/L. Polymerase chain reaction techniques were used to determine the genetic mechanisms of resistance. Results. There were 749 resistant isolates of which 474 (63%) were streptococci. Only a quarter of the patients had no resistant streptococci before treatment started. There were increases in the numbers of resistant isolates and in the number of patients carrying a resistant flora during and after treatment. The most common genes identified were mefA/E in isolates with low-level resistance and ermA/M in isolates with high-level resistance. Conclusions. There is a pool of streptococci carrying genes associated with macrolide resistance in the normal respiratory flora of generally healthy adults. Differences between the patients treated with clarithromycin and those treated with azithromycin were difficult to assess because of the large number of patients in each group with macrolide-resistant streptococci before treatment. Although there were some differences these were not statistically significant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, A., Bathgate, T., & Phillips, I. (2002). Erythromycin susceptibility of viridans streptococci from the normal throat flora of patients treated with azithromycin or clarithromycin. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 8(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00347.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free