This chapter examines the global trend of school choice through privatization and quasi-privatization and considers the implications for disadvantaged populations. Examination of school choice policies in Puerto Rico (charter schools), Chile (school vouchers), and the United Kingdom (academies) helps illustrate how market-based reforms attempt to address inequities in educational opportunity, access, and performance. The pursuit of unregulated school choice through selfgoverned schools in the United Kingdom and Puerto Rico appears to exacerbate disparities, prioritize schooling as a private good at the expense of the public good, and promote inefficient and inequitable dual systems of education. Under Chile’s differentiated voucher program, attempts were made to level the playing field for disadvantaged families; however, outcomes suggest a system of privilege persists. School choice policies that promote the value of individualism are ill equipped to achieve socially just ends for all students, particularly those from marginalized groups. A renewal of the democratic principles of the collective good is called for, where common interests guide public policy and public policy serves common interests.
CITATION STYLE
Cobb, C. D., & Irizarry, J. (2020). Private interests and the common good: Conflicting priorities in a school choice world. In Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education (pp. 153–168). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14625-2_123
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.