Comparison of two methods to extract DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues and their impact on EGFR mutation detection in non-small cell lung carcinoma

12Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Molecular pathology tests are often carried for clinicopathological diagnosis and pathologists have established large collections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) banks. However, extraction of DNA from FFPE is a laborious and challenging for researchers in clinical laboratories. The aim of this study was to compare two widely used DNA extraction methods: using a QIAamp DNA FFPE kit from Qiagen and a Cobas Sample Preparation Kit from Roche, and evaluated the effect of the DNA quality on molecular diagnostics. Methods: DNA from FFPE non-small cell lung carcinoma tissues including biopsy and surgical specimens was extracted with both QIAamp DNA FFPE and Cobas Sample Preparation Kits and EGFR mutations of nonsmall cell lung carcinomas were detected by real-time quantitative PCR using the extracted DNA. Results and Conclusion: Our results showed that DNA extracted by QIAamp and Cobas methods were both suitable to detect downstream EGFR mutation in surgical specimens. Howover, Cobas method could yield more DNA from biopsy specimens, and gain much better EGFR mutation results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, Y. C., Zhang, Q., Huang, Y. H., Liu, Y. F., & Chen, H. L. (2014). Comparison of two methods to extract DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues and their impact on EGFR mutation detection in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15(6), 2733–2737. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2733

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free