ADA1/ADAp ratio in pleural tuberculosis: An excellent diagnostic parameter in pleural fluid

47Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analysed the efficacy of pleural adenosine deaminase (ADA(p)) and the ADA1/ADA(p) ratio in the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis in 103 pleural effusions, 27 of which were tuberculosis (TB) and 76 other diagnoses (non-TB). Smears, cultures and pleural biopsies were carried out in all cases, and were used for final diagnosis. The diagnostic yield of the parameters under study were as follows: smears/cultures of mycobacteria in fluid 11.1%/33.3%; biopsy 33.3%/51.8% and tuberculosis granulomas 85.1%. The levels of ADA(p) and ADA1/ADA(p) ratio in TB and non-TB groups showed very significant differences (P < 0.00001); in the TB group: ADA, 54.7 ± 23.5 IU and ADA1/ADA(p) 0.27 ± 0.08; in the non-TB group: ADA(p) 18.3 ± 43.2 IU and ADA1/ADA(p) 0.64 ± 0.14. The assay established ADA levels in pleural fluid ≥ 40 IU and an ADA1/ADA(p), ratio ≤ 0.42 as cut-off levels to identify individuals in the TB group, with a sensitivity of 88.8%/100%, a specificity of 92%/98.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 80%/96.4%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.8%/100% and an accuracy of 91.2%/99.02%. The ADA(p) levels in 27 patients with TB, showed close correlation with the number of monocyte macrophages (P = 0.001), but not with the number of lymphocytes (P = n.s.). The ADA1/ADA(p) ratio overcomes the limitations of ADA(p) (false positives and negatives), and is the most useful parameter for diagnosis on account of a high diagnostic yield, low cost and speed of the asssay for identifying a pleural tuberculosis diagnosis, when compared with traditional methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pérez-Rodríguez, E., Pérez Walton, I. J., Sánchez Hernández, J. J., Pallarés, E., Rubi, J., Jiménez Castro, D., & Díaz Nuevo, G. (1999). ADA1/ADAp ratio in pleural tuberculosis: An excellent diagnostic parameter in pleural fluid. Respiratory Medicine, 93(11), 816–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(99)90267-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free