The theory of communicative action of Jürgen Habermas with religious issues in the public sphere

  • Ky Dong T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The article summarizes the main arguments in J. Habermas’ theory of communicative action, identifying three functions that communicative action can perform: to be used to convey information, to establish social relationships with others, and to express one’s opinions or feelings. By analyzing the category of “communicative rationality” with religious issues in the public sphere, in relation to language, discourse ethics, it is shown that the public sphere is the environment where dialogues in all areas take place to meet the needs of citizens. (According to Habermas, Kant was the first philosophy to give to public sphere “its completed theoretical structure” in a text of political philosophy, entitled “What is Enlightenment?”). Religions may not directly influence politics, but still, have the function of directing in society. J. Habermas determines that religion cannot be restricted to the private sphere, but must actively participate in the public sphere, where interactions and dialogues take place, as a catalyst for the process of solidarity to exist, to bring a new life force to the world. It is the place for members of society to have conversations and engage with each other. The theory of communication by J. Habermas is timely contemplation with a deeply humane spirit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ky Dong, T. (2020). The theory of communicative action of Jürgen Habermas with religious issues in the public sphere. Science & Technology Development Journal - Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(1), First. https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjssh.v4i1.536

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free