Strategic forgetting: Britain, China, and the South China Sea, 1894-1938

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article clarifies a mythologized episode in the early development of the South China Sea disputes and shows how it was later 'forgotten' by British policymakers for strategic reasons. Using documents from the UK National Archives it confirms, for the first time, that Qing/Chinese officials did deny responsibility for the Paracel Islands in 1898/1899. It then shows how this correspondence was strategically ignored by British officials during the 1930s in the context of renewed disputes between China, France, and Japan over the sovereignty of the islands. It argues that during the 1930s, British officials sought to bolster the Chinese position in the South China Sea because of a concern that France would remain neutral in any forthcoming conflict. This resulted in Britain taking a view on the sovereignty disputes that was at odds with the evidence in its own archives but which provided useful political support for the Republic of China.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayton, B. (2023). Strategic forgetting: Britain, China, and the South China Sea, 1894-1938. Modern Asian Studies, 57(3), 966–985. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X22000373

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free