Introducing NMDA antagonists into clinical practice: why head injury trials?

22Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

1. Head injury is the major cause of death and severe disability in young adults. Evidence from clinical studies shows ischaemic brain damage to be the major determinant of bad outcome, and that a proportion of this (perhaps up to 40%) is delayed, thus offering an opportunity for 'prophylactic' therapy. 2. Laboratory studies in several relevant animal models of human head injury (fluid percussion, subdural haematoma, and focal ischaemia by middle cerebral occlusion) indicate that excitatory amino acids are important mediators of brain damage. Pretreatment with NMDA antagonists has shown that the extent of ischaemic damage may be dramatically reduced in these models (68% reduction in the cat MCA occlusion model, 54% in the rat subdural haematoma model). 3. Trials of NMDA antagonists in human head injury are therefore strongly indicated. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bullock, R. (1992). Introducing NMDA antagonists into clinical practice: why head injury trials? British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 34(5), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1992.tb05648.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free