The Evolutionary Meaning of World 3

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The World 3 (W3) theory outlined by Popper in the 1960s has been diversely received, raising enthusiasms as well as severe criticisms. In this paper, I resituate the theory in the development of Popper’s philosophy. I not only present the three “sources” (evolutionism, K. Bühler’s theory of language, Frege’s semantics) of W3, but I also show that the first one dominates the two others. Comparing it with a few other evolutionary philosophies, I propose to understand Popper’s metaphysics as part of an evolutionary and spiritualist philosophy, which was, however, always balanced by a strong ethical reminder of the inescapability of human responsibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cambier, H. (2016). The Evolutionary Meaning of World 3. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(3), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116641609

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free