Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective randomized trial

54Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To compare transumbilical single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (TSPLH) with traditional four-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Methods: Patients with benign uterine disease were assigned to receive either TSPLH (n = 52) or TLH (n = 56). Duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, conversion rate, time to first flatus, duration of immobilization, post -operative analgesia requirement, port site infection, port hernia, duration of hospital stay, postoperative fever rate and percentage patient satisfaction were recorded. Results: TSPLH and TLH were both performed successfully. TSPLH was associated with significantly longer duration of surgery, shorter duration of immobilization, lower rate of port site infection and higher patient satisfaction than TLH. There were no other significant differences between the two groups. All subjects recovered fully and no postoperative complications occurred during a 6-month (minimum) follow-up period. Conclusions: TSPLH was found to be a feasible and safe approach for laparoscopic hysterectomy. © 2012 Field House Publishing LLP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, M., Han, Y., & Feng, Y. C. (2012). Single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: A prospective randomized trial. Journal of International Medical Research, 40(2), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001204000234

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free