Avoiding psychological (re)traumatisation in dentistry when working with patients who are adult survivors of child sex abuse

14Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction Seven percent of the adult population in the UK, including one in six women, report unwanted sexual experiences before the age of 16. The impacts of psychological trauma following child sexual abuse (CSA) creates difficulties for many survivors in accessing dental care due to fears of reminders of abuse, the power imbalance with the dentist and triggered traumatic responses. Aims To analyse and report CSA survivor perspectives of dental care and offer suggestions for practice. Method Qualitative semi-structured interviews of 17 CSA survivors generated data as part of a broader study investigating trust and trustworthiness in survivor-professional relationships. The range of dental interactions and the needs survivors described when receiving dental treatment are presented. Transcripts were analysed using NVivo software and thematic analysis methodology. Results Three main themes were identified: the dental encounter ('it really panics me'); the opportunity to disclose; and choice and control. Conclusion This is the first UK study to present qualitative data from CSA survivors about their experiences of dental care. Survivors wish to access dental care but tailored support is needed to ameliorate reminders of abuse and traumatic stress triggers. Trauma-informed care may address difficulties with treatment if dental staff adopt flexible approaches and work collaboratively with survivors to facilitate relational safety. (Please note, in this paper, 'survivors' refers to those sexually abused as children).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alyce, S., Taggart, D., Montaque, I., & Turton, J. (2022). Avoiding psychological (re)traumatisation in dentistry when working with patients who are adult survivors of child sex abuse. British Dental Journal, 233(8), 666–670. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-5103-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free