Providing Context: Medical Device Litigation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters

9Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the last few years, an increasing number of lawsuits have been filed involving inferior vena cava filters. This has prompted the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to centralize these lawsuits into two multidistrict litigations: one for Cook's filters and one for Bard's. Both sets of cases share similar questions of facts, in particular whether these filters' design and manufacturing practices made them unreasonably prone to serious complications. The resolution of these cases will add to a larger legal debate concerning how much legal protection the 1976 Medical Device Amendments should offer firms from tort liability. As a specialty that often relies on medical devices, it is not only important for interventional radiologists to have a general understanding of medical device litigation but also to reflect upon the approaches to informed consent regarding these devices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keller, E. J., & Vogelzang, R. L. (2016). Providing Context: Medical Device Litigation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters. Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 33(2), 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1581086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free