The research investigated how readers comprehended reflexive pronoun anaphors (e.g., himself or herself) that occurred in the same sentence with an antecedent that was modified by a genitive noun phrase€(NP). Prior research suggested that during the search for an antecedent, readers consider only those preceding discourse entities that are prominent in the discourse; thus, genitive€NPs would not be considered because they lack discourse prominence (Badecker & Straub, 2002). Two reading experiments tested this claim. In Experiment€1, genitive€NPs were noun descriptions that were strongly stereotyped for gender (e.g., ?The executive?s/secretary?s father cut himself??). In Experiment€2, genitive€NPs were gender-specific proper names (e.g., ?John?s/Mary?s father cut himself??), similar to those used in the prior research. The results indicated that genitive€NPs that were strongly stereotyped for gender influenced sentence processing time, but genitive€NPs that were gender-specific proper names did not; thus, genitive€NPs are not uniformly excluded from consideration during the resolution of reflexive pronouns.
CITATION STYLE
Kennison, S. M. (2016). The Role of Discourse Prominence in Antecedent Search: The Case of Genitive Noun Phrases. Discours, (18). https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.9202
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.