Effect of motivational scaffolding on self-efficacy, procrastination, and learning achievement in students of different cognitive styles

2Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research analyzes the effects of motivational scaffolding on procrastination, learning achievement, and academic and online self-efficacy in students with differing cognitive styles in the dimension of field dependence-independence (FDI), that are learning mathematical content in m-learning environments. This study involved 87 students from two seventh-grade classes from a public school in the municipality of Cundinamarca, Colombia. The research followed a quasi-experimental design. A group of students worked through an m-learning environment, which included within its structure a motivational scaffolding. Another group worked through an m-learning environment that did not include a scaffolding. All students were given the EFT masked figures test to classify them into field-dependent, intermediate and independent. A MANCOVA factor analysis was performed. The results indicate that scaffolding favored academic and online self-efficacy. It is possible to assert that field-dependent subjects are inclined to procrastinate and exhibit low levels of academic self-efficacy versus intermediate and field-independent peers. The data show that students with different cognitive styles achieved equivalent learning because of scaffolding in the m-learning environment. It was also concluded that both academic and online self-efficacy of field-dependent students may be favored by the interaction of scaffolding included in the m-learning environment and their cognitive style.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

López-Vargas, O., Garavito-Martínez, L., & Valencia-Vallejo, N. (2025). Effect of motivational scaffolding on self-efficacy, procrastination, and learning achievement in students of different cognitive styles. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 17(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2025.17.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free