Comparative Analysis of Cutaneous Fungi in Atopic Dermatitis Patients and Healthy Individuals

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease triggered by diverse factors. Microbes are one of the crucial risk factors for AD development or exacerbation. However, the effect of a fungal burden on AD has been overlooked compared to bacteria. Objective: This study aimed to comparatively analyze cutaneous fungal distribution between AD patients and healthy individuals by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based analysis. Methods: Skin samples of AD outpatients and healthy individuals collected at the Chung-Ang University were analyzed. Representative AD-associated fungal genera, Candida, dermatophytes, and Malassezia, were analyzed using specific primer and amplification methods. Amplicons were sequenced, and the fungal distribution of both groups were compared. Results: Totally, 211 patients and 23 healthy individuals were studied. Of the 211 patients, 10.90% (23/211) had Candida species, whereas 0% (0/23) healthy individuals showed its presence. The most frequently detected species in patients was Candida albicans (5.21%) followed by Candida parapsilosis (3.79%). For dermatophytes, 1.42% (3/211) of patients showed positive results, whereas 0% (0/23) healthy individuals showed positive results. Malassezia species were identified in 20.85% (44/211) and 8.70% (2/23) in patients and healthy individuals, respectively. Malassezia restricta was the most frequently identified species in the AD patient group, and the only species found in the healthy control group. Conclusion: The distribution of Candida spp., dermatophytes, and Malassezia spp. are altered with AD development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, Y., Park, K. Y., Han, H. S., Lee, M. K., & Seo, S. J. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Cutaneous Fungi in Atopic Dermatitis Patients and Healthy Individuals. Annals of Dermatology, 34(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2022.34.2.118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free