Aging human circadian rhythms: Conventional wisdom may not always be right

165Citations
Citations of this article
155Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This review discusses the ways in which the circadian rhythms of older people are different from those of younger adults. After a brief discussion of clinical issues, the review describes the conventional wisdom regarding age-related changes in circadian rhythms. These can be summarized as four assertions regarding what happens to people as they get older: 1) the amplitude of their circadian rhythms reduces, 2) the phase of their circadian rhythms becomes earlier, 3) their natural free-running period (tau) shortens, and 4) their ability to tolerate abrupt phase shifts (e.g., from jet travel or night work) worsens. The review then discusses the empirical evidence for and against these assertions and discusses some alternative explanations. The conclusions are that although older people undoubtedly have earlier circadian phases than younger adults, and have more trouble coping with shift work and jet lag, evidence for the assertions about rhythm amplitude and tau are, at best, mixed. © 2005 Sage Publications.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Monk, T. H. (2005, August). Aging human circadian rhythms: Conventional wisdom may not always be right. Journal of Biological Rhythms. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730405277378

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free