Evaluation of usability and workload associated with paper strips as compared to virtual flight strips used for ramp operations

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper describes a study comparing the use of paper strips with virtual flight strips depicted on a new user interface, the Ramp Traffic Console (RTC), designed for use by ramp controllers to be used in place of paper strips. A Human-In-the-Loop (HITL) experiment was performed as the fifth in a series of six HITL simulation studies designed to evaluate a pushback Decision Support Tool (DST) concept for Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT). Workload and usability were assessed in post-run and post-study questionnaires. In the RTC virtual flight strip condition, post-run questionnaire results show lower workload ratings across all aspects of workload; additionally, a trend is found toward increased usability ratings. Post-study questionnaire results indicate a preference for RTC over paper strips. Additional research is suggested with more training runs and a greater number of participants to increase statistical power. It is also suggested that this new technology be re-evaluated as a part of the ATD-2 field testing activities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dulchinos, V. (2019). Evaluation of usability and workload associated with paper strips as compared to virtual flight strips used for ramp operations. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 794, pp. 603–614). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_61

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free