Abstract
Objective: Few have evaluated the scale assumptions studies of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) with stroke survivors. The aims of this study were to evaluate the scale assumptions of SF-36 using Swedish patients after stroke and to compare patients' quality of life with that of a healthy population. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: SF-36 was tested in 188 patients (mean age 74 years) with acute stroke consecutively enrolled from a stroke unit in southern Sweden during 2003-05. Methods: Data were collected by interview during a home visit 2-3 weeks after discharge. Psychometric analyses were conducted, and stroke survivors' quality of life was compared with a Swedish normal population. Results: The internal consistency reliability was > 0.70 for all scales. There were notable floor and/or ceiling effects for 3 scales. For 7 scales, there was the expected association with the 2 summary scales. Compared with a normal Swedish population, stroke has a negative effect on health-related quality of life, especially for patients aged 45-54 years. Conclusion: SF-36 functions well as a measure of health-related quality of life in Swedish patients after stroke, but the 2 summary scales have shortcomings. Our findings support good divergent validity of SF-36 for discriminating health-related quality of life of stroke groups and normal populations. © 2009 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2009 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Almborg, A. H., & Berg, S. (2009). Quality of life among Swedish patients after stroke: Psychometric evaluation of SF-36. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0287
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.