The impact of LH, E2, and P level of HCG administration day on outcomes of in vitro fertilization in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

12Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) administration on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Study Design: In this retrospective study, 129 infertile women undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments were included; these cycles were stratified according to LH levels of > 1.12 IU/L or <1.12 U/L and according to E2 levels of ≥ 1, 005.89 pmol/L or < 1, 005.89 pmol/L. The main outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate. Results: The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the group with LH ≥1.12 IU/L than in the group with LH <1.12 U/L (43.28% vs. 30.65%, p < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate was also higher in the group with E2 ≥ 1, 005.89 pmol/L than in the group with average E2 < 1, 005.89 pmol/L (42.86% vs. 30.51%, p < 0.05). Among the LH, E2, and P levels on the day of HCG administration, LH level was the most important predictor of outcomes of IVF in COH. The present data showed an adverse effect of low serum LH level (LH <1.12 IU/L) on the day of HCG administration on clinical pregnancy rate. E2 level can also predict the outcomes of IVF in COH. Conclusions: Low serum LH level (LH <1.12 IU/L) and low serum E2 level (average E2 < 1, 005.89 pmol/L) on the day of HCG administration led to low clinical pregnancy rates, while the P level on the day of HCG administration may have had little effect on clinical pregnancy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wei, M., Zhang, X. M., Gu, F. L., Lv, F., Ji, Y. R., Liu, K. F., … Hu, R. (2015). The impact of LH, E2, and P level of HCG administration day on outcomes of in vitro fertilization in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, 42(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.12891/ceog1850.2015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free