Can explanatory reasons be good reasons for action?

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What kind of thing is a reason for action? Are reasons for action subjective states of the agent, such as desires and/or beliefs? Or are they, rather, objective features of situations that favor certain actions? The suggestion offered in this article is that neither strategy satisfies. What is needed is a third category for classifying reasons which makes them out to be neither purely subjective nor purely objective. In brief: a reason for action is a feature of the situation that matters to the agent. On this proposal, subjective states of the agent are indeed indispensable in characterizing reasons for action. Precisely which set of situational features matter to an agent - precisely what shape the agent experiences the situation as having - depends on the agent's psychological makeup. Those features themselves are not psychological states, however, and it is precisely those features that constitute the agent's reasons for action. © 2013 Metaphilosophy LLC and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beaulieu, G. (2013). Can explanatory reasons be good reasons for action? Metaphilosophy, 44(4), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free