The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees, 1989-1997: Sharing the burden and passing the buck

61Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees, 1989-1997, has been hailed as a model of international solidarity and burden-sharing and criticized as an example of international buck-passing and questionable compromises. Looking back on this agreement-one in which both Sergio Vieira de Mello and Arthur Helton played significant roles-a fair conclusion might be that it was both. Though flawed in its implementation, however, the CPA does serve as a model of how interlocking commitments-to asylum, resettlement and repatriation-can promote regional cooperation in response to protracted refugee crises. Considering their roles in the CPA, though they operated from different institutional vantage-points, both de Mello and Helton showed an ability to combine humanitarian principles with political pragmatism. © Oxford University Press 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, W. C. (2004). The Comprehensive Plan of Action for Indochinese Refugees, 1989-1997: Sharing the burden and passing the buck. Journal of Refugee Studies, 17(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/17.3.319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free