Institutional repositories: Is the open access door half open or half shut?

2Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The response of the UK Government to the Report on science publishing by the Science and Technology Select Committee of the House of Commons is criticized for failing to take the necessary action to research or help catalyse a change in the publishing model. The initiatives of the National Institutes of Health and the Wellcome Foundation in setting up central archives are examined and their utility questioned. The evidence base for a change to open access is explored. © Evan Harris 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, E. (2005). Institutional repositories: Is the open access door half open or half shut? Learned Publishing, 18(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1087/0953151053585000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free