Hedging in Iranian English language teachers' spoken language: Any differential effect for gender?

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the importance attached in the literature to the use of hedges, the study of hedging has been shown to target, mainly, the written corpora of various types and so remains neglected in naturally occurring speech. Moreover, the existing discussion predominantly encompass cross-cultural variation in the use of hedging devices and gender as a variable has largely been overlooked. This study was conducted to shed more light on the differences between 4 Iranian male and female English instructors'use of hedging and its different realizations in their actual speech. One teaching session of each instructor was videotaped and the instructors were asked to view their video and to recollect their reasons for resorting to different activities for teaching. Their recollections were recorded and transcribed. Based on Hyland's classification of hedges, the frequency and realization of hedging in male and female corpus were identified. Results showed considerable differences in the overall distribution of hedges as well as certain types of hedging linguistic devices throughout the male and female corpus.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tajik, L., & Ramezani, A. (2018). Hedging in Iranian English language teachers’ spoken language: Any differential effect for gender? Open Linguistics, 4(1), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free