WOMEN IN PHILOSOPHY: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION, PREVALENCE, VISIBILITY, AND GENERATIONAL CHANGE

  • Schwitzgebel E
  • Jennings C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Drawing on data from a range of publicly available sources, we analyze the prevalence, visibility, and subfield specializations of women in philosophy, and how the situation has changed over time. Our data strongly support three conclusions: (1) gender disparity remains large in mainstream Anglophone philosophy; (2) ethics, construed broadly to include social and political philosophy, is closer to gender parity than are other fields in philosophy; and (3) women’s involvement in philosophy has increased since the 1970s. However, women’s involvement and visibility in mainstream Anglophone philosophy has increased only slowly; and by some measures, there has been virtually no gain since the 1990s. We find mixed evidence on the question of whether (4) gender disparity is greater at the highest level of visibility or prestige.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwitzgebel, E., & Jennings, C. D. (2017). WOMEN IN PHILOSOPHY: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION, PREVALENCE, VISIBILITY, AND GENERATIONAL CHANGE. Public Affairs Quarterly, 31(2), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/44732784

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free