Loss of T cell antigen recognition arising from changes in peptide and major histocompatibility complex protein flexibility: Implications for vaccine design

46Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Modification of the primary anchor positions of antigenic peptides to improve binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins is a commonly used strategy for engineering peptide-based vaccine candidates. However, such peptide modifications do not always improve antigenicity, complicating efforts to design effective vaccines for cancer and infectious disease. Here we investigated the MART-1 27-35 tumor antigen, for which anchor modification (replacement of the position two alanine with leucine) dramatically reduces or ablates antigenicity with a wide range of T cell clones despite significantly improving peptide binding to MHC. We found that anchor modification in the MART-1 27-35 antigen enhances the flexibility of both the peptide and the HLA-A*0201 molecule. Although the resulting entropic effects contribute to the improved binding of the peptide to MHC, they also negatively impact T cell receptor binding to the peptide·MHC complex. These results help explain how the "anchor-fixing" strategy fails to improve antigenicity in this case, and more generally, may be relevant for understanding the high specificity characteristic of the T cell repertoire. In addition to impacting vaccine design, modulation of peptide and MHC flexibility through changes to antigenic peptides may present an evolutionary strategy for the escape of pathogens from immune destruction. © 2011 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Insaidoo, F. K., Borbulevych, O. Y., Hossain, M., Santhanagopolan, S. M., Baxter, T. K., & Baker, B. M. (2011). Loss of T cell antigen recognition arising from changes in peptide and major histocompatibility complex protein flexibility: Implications for vaccine design. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286(46), 40163–40173. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.283564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free