Antibody responses to plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax and prospective risk of plasmodium spp. Infection postpartum

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Postpartum women may have an altered susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. The relationship between naturally acquired malarial immunity and susceptibility to malaria postpartum is yet to be determined. IgG levels were measured against P. falciparum and P. vivax antigens from delivery in 201 postpartum and 201 nonpregnant controls over 12 weeks. Associations between time-varying antibody levels and time to first microscopically confirmed species-specific infection were determined by Cox regression. Associations between antibody levels and prospective risk of Plasmodium infection were similar in postpartum and control women. A 2-fold increase in P. falciparum antibody levels was associated with increased prospective risk of P. falciparum infection (hazard ratio [HR] range = 1.37-1.94). Antibody levels against most P. vivax antigens displayed no association with prospective risk of P. vivax infection (HR range = 1.02-1.05) with the exception of PvMSP119 antibodies that were weakly associated with prospective risk of P. vivax infection (HR = 1.14 (95% confidence interval = 1.02, 1.28) per 2-fold increase in levels). Associations between antibody levels and prospective risk of infection attenuated when adjusted for documented retrospective exposure. Serology may be a useful tool to predict and monitor women at increased risk of P. falciparum infection postpartum, particularly in the absence of a detailed history of retrospective infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McLean, A. R. D., Boel, M., McGready, R., Ataide, R., Drew, D., Tsuboi, T., … Fowkes, F. J. I. (2017). Antibody responses to plasmodium falciparum and plasmodium vivax and prospective risk of plasmodium spp. Infection postpartum. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 96(5), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0690

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free