An artificial intelligence system suggests arbitrariness of death penalty

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The arguments against the death penalty in the United States have centered on due process and fairness. Since the death penalty is so rarely rendered and subsequently applied, it appears on the surface to be arbitrary. Considering the potential utility of determining whether or not a death row inmate is actually executed along with the promising behavior of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) as classifiers led us into the development, training, and testing of an ANN as a tool for predicting death penalty outcomes. For our ANN we reconstructed the profiles of 1,366 death row inmates by utilizing variables that are independent of the substantive characteristics of the crime for which they have been convicted. The ANN's successful performance in predicting executions has serious implications concerning the fairness of the justice system. © International Journal of Law and Information Technology Vol. 16 No. 1 Oxford University Press 2007; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karamouzis, S. T., & Harper, D. W. (2008). An artificial intelligence system suggests arbitrariness of death penalty. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eam006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free