Magical Amulets, Magical Thinking, and Semiotics in Early Byzantium

  • Tuerk-Stonberg J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The term ‘magic’ is problematic. Magic studies have rapidly developed in recent decades and have suggested various ways of understanding the term, especially regarding objects from the medieval Roman Empire, Byzantium. Two early Byzantine amulets (as case studies) display conventional semiotic structures, which include persuasive analogy, speech-acts , and show-acts . Persuasive analogy, speech-acts, and show-acts – and how they organize information – operate also in religious, medical, and philosophical examples. Accordingly, art, archaeology, and texts of ritual power exemplify intersecting communities of thought and various types of social practices. Magic studies is interdisciplinary, and it encourages critique of modern assumptions regarding authority and of our intellectual colonization of times past. This essay is broad with several object examples across media, written as a conference presentation. Another approach to these semiotic structures on magical amulets – with examination of fewer objects and wider attention to the historiography of magic studies – will appear in the forthcoming Oxford Handbook on Byzantine Art and Architecture , ed. Ellen Schwartz.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tuerk-Stonberg, J. (2021). Magical Amulets, Magical Thinking, and Semiotics in Early Byzantium. Old World: Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1163/26670755-01010004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free