Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures

126Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I propose a novel way to distinguish between agreement and clitic doubling. The innovation lies in examining what happens when the relation between the relevant agreement morphology and the full noun phrase fails to obtain: whether the agreement morpheme still shows up, bearing default π-features, or disappears altogether. The workings of the proposed diagnostic are demonstrated using a family of constructions in ''substandard'' Basque (Etxepare 2006). Besides supporting the proposed diagnostic, the analysis of Basque provides a new perspective on the typological status of the Basque agreement system, as well as evidence against the traditional analysis of unergatives in Basque as being underlyingly transitive. © 2009 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Preminger, O. (2009). Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(4), 619–666. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free